IMAR vs VOO
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - March vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IMAR | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $108M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 11 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +4.51% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +10.49% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -9.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 1, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
IMAR vs VOO Performance
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - March (IMAR) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IMAR returned +10.49% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, IMAR is up 4.51% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 7.1% for IMAR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.1% for IMAR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IMAR charges 0.85% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IMAR currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for VOO.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IMAR or VOO?
IMAR has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IMAR or VOO?
Over the past year IMAR returned +10.49% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IMAR annualized +9.11% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IMAR or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 7.1% for IMAR. Worst drawdown: IMAR -9.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both IMAR and VOO?
IMAR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, IMAR or VOO?
IMAR yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.