INTW vs IVV
GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. INTW delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | INTW | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $301M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +290.28% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +961.50% | +21.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 278.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -69.2% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 13, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
INTW vs IVV Performance
GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) is a ETF from GraniteShares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year INTW returned +961.50% while IVV returned +21.64%. Year to date, INTW is up 290.28% versus a gain of 13.72% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
INTW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 278.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -69.2% for INTW and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
INTW charges 1.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $3 annually, a gap of $147 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, INTW currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
INTW and IVV share 1 holdings out of 505 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in INTW | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| INTC | 66.67% | 0.77% | 65.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, INTW or IVV?
INTW has an expense ratio of 1.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $147 per year of difference.
Which performed better, INTW or IVV?
Over the past year INTW returned +961.50% vs +21.64% for IVV, so INTW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), INTW annualized +256.22% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, INTW or IVV?
INTW has been the more volatile fund at 278.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: INTW -69.2% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both INTW and IVV?
INTW and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between INTW and IVV?
INTW and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 505 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, INTW or IVV?
INTW yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.