INTW vs VYM
GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. INTW delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | INTW | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $301M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +265.59% | +16.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +1000.12% | +26.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 279.0% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -69.2% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 13, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
INTW vs VYM Performance
GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year INTW returned +1000.12% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, INTW is up 265.59% versus a gain of 16.16% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
INTW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 279.0% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -69.2% for INTW and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
INTW charges 1.50% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $4 annually, a gap of $146 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, INTW currently yields 0.00% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
INTW and VYM share 0 holdings out of 559 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, INTW or VYM?
INTW has an expense ratio of 1.50% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $146 per year of difference.
Which performed better, INTW or VYM?
Over the past year INTW returned +1000.12% vs +26.05% for VYM, so INTW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), INTW annualized +241.72% vs +7.09% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, INTW or VYM?
INTW has been the more volatile fund at 279.0% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: INTW -69.2% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both INTW and VYM?
INTW and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between INTW and VYM?
INTW and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 559 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, INTW or VYM?
INTW yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.