IPAV vs IVV
Global X Infrastructure Development ex-US ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IPAV | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $6M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.52% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 100 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +8.72% | +14.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +16.32% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | GLOBALXETFS | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 27, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
IPAV vs IVV Performance
Global X Infrastructure Development ex-US ETF (IPAV) is a ETF from GLOBALXETFS and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IPAV returned +16.32% while IVV returned +21.79%. Year to date, IPAV is up 8.72% versus a gain of 14.29% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IPAV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.6% for IPAV and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IPAV charges 0.55% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IPAV currently yields 1.52% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
IPAV and IVV share 0 holdings out of 605 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IPAV or IVV?
IPAV has an expense ratio of 0.55% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $52 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IPAV or IVV?
Over the past year IPAV returned +16.32% vs +21.79% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IPAV annualized +15.18% vs +7.06% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IPAV or IVV?
IPAV has been the more volatile fund at 16.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IPAV -14.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both IPAV and IVV?
IPAV and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IPAV and IVV?
IPAV and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 605 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IPAV or IVV?
IPAV yields 1.52% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IPAV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.