IPAV vs VTI
Global X Infrastructure Development ex-US ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IPAV | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $6M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.52% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 100 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +8.72% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +16.32% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.8% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | GLOBALXETFS | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 27, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
IPAV vs VTI Performance
Global X Infrastructure Development ex-US ETF (IPAV) is a ETF from GLOBALXETFS and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IPAV returned +16.32% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, IPAV is up 8.72% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IPAV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.8% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.6% for IPAV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IPAV charges 0.55% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IPAV currently yields 1.52% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
IPAV and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2887 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IPAV or VTI?
IPAV has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $52 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IPAV or VTI?
Over the past year IPAV returned +16.32% vs +22.43% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IPAV annualized +15.18% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IPAV or VTI?
IPAV has been the more volatile fund at 16.8% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: IPAV -14.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both IPAV and VTI?
IPAV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IPAV and VTI?
IPAV and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2887 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IPAV or VTI?
IPAV yields 1.52% while VTI yields 1.07%, so IPAV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.