IPAV vs VTI
Global X Infrastructure Development ex-US ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, IPAV or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IPAV | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $5M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.52% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 108 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +8.74% | +13.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.64% | +20.00%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.95% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.81% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.3% | 12.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -14.6%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $13,163 | $14,083Best |
| Fund Family | GLOBALXETFS | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 27, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 28, 2024 to Sep 4, 2026 (2 years).
IPAV vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
IPAV vs VTI Performance
Global X Infrastructure Development ex-US ETF (IPAV) is an ETF from GLOBALXETFS and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IPAV returned +16.64% while VTI returned +20.00%. Year to date, IPAV is up 8.74% versus a gain of 13.59% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IPAV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.3% compared with 12.7% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.6% for IPAV and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IPAV charges 0.55% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IPAV currently yields 1.52% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 100 holdings in IPAV and 2,787 in VTI, totalling 99.9% and 92.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in IPAV and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 108 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IPAV and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IPAV or VTI?
IPAV has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $52 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IPAV or VTI?
Over the past year IPAV returned +16.64% vs +20.00% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IPAV annualized +14.73% vs +18.67% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IPAV or VTI?
IPAV has been the more volatile fund at 16.3% annualized versus 12.7% for VTI. Worst drawdown: IPAV -14.6% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both IPAV and VTI?
IPAV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IPAV or VTI?
IPAV yields 1.52% while VTI yields 1.07%, so IPAV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than IPAV?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.