IQDF vs IVV
FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IQDF delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IQDF | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.1B | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.04% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 264 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +17.25% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +30.27% | +21.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.78% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.58% | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -47.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Flexshares Trust | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 12, 2013 | May 15, 2000 |
IQDF vs IVV Performance
FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund (IQDF) is a ETF from Flexshares Trust and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IQDF returned +30.27% while IVV returned +21.64%. Year to date, IQDF is up 17.25% versus a gain of 13.72% for IVV.
Over three years, IQDF compounded at +23.78% per year against +21.55% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +11.58% and +13.27% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs +4.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 15.0% for IQDF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -47.3% for IQDF and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IQDF charges 0.47% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $3 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IQDF currently yields 3.04% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
IQDF and IVV share 1 holdings out of 693 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IQDF | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROP | 1.73% | 0.05% | 1.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IQDF or IVV?
IQDF has an expense ratio of 0.47% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $44 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IQDF or IVV?
Over the past year IQDF returned +30.27% vs +21.64% for IVV, so IQDF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), IQDF annualized +4.88% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IQDF or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 15.0% for IQDF. Worst drawdown: IQDF -47.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both IQDF and IVV?
IQDF and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IQDF and IVV?
IQDF and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 693 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IQDF or IVV?
IQDF yields 3.04% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IQDF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.