IQDF vs VOO
Northern Trust International Quality Dividend ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, IQDF or VOO?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. IQDF led over 1Y and 3Y, VOO over 5Y and the full window. IQDF is less concentrated, with 19.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IQDF | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.2B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.98% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 265 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +19.45%Best | +13.37% |
| 1Y Return | +33.11%Best | +20.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.56%Best | +21.29% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.91% | +12.89%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.0% | 14.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -47.3% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,553 | $18,335Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 19.9%Best | 36.4% |
| Fund Family | Northern Trust Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 12, 2013 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 16, 2013 to Sep 4, 2026 (13.4 years).
IQDF vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 13.4 years both funds cover.
IQDF vs VOO Performance
Northern Trust International Quality Dividend ETF (IQDF) is an ETF from Northern Trust Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IQDF returned +33.11% while VOO returned +20.08%. Year to date, IQDF is up 19.45% versus a gain of 13.37% for VOO.
Over three years, IQDF compounded at +24.56% per year against +21.29% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +11.91% and +12.89% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.28% annualized vs +5.00%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IQDF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.0% compared with 14.4% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -47.3% for IQDF and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IQDF charges 0.47% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $3 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IQDF currently yields 2.98% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
1.3% of IQDF's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.1% of VOO's money is in holdings IQDF also owns.
IQDF and VOO share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 188 positions we hold weights for in IQDF and 505 in VOO, against full books of 265 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 496 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for IQDF (99.4% of the fund), and 2 for IQDF that do not appear in VOO (0.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IQDF | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROPRoper Technologies Inc. | 1.28% | 0.05% | 1.23% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IQDF and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IQDF or VOO?
IQDF has an expense ratio of 0.47% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $44 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IQDF or VOO?
Over the past year IQDF returned +33.11% vs +20.08% for VOO, so IQDF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), IQDF annualized +5.00% vs +13.28% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IQDF or VOO?
IQDF has been the more volatile fund at 15.0% annualized versus 14.4% for VOO. Worst drawdown: IQDF -47.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both IQDF and VOO?
IQDF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IQDF and VOO?
1.3% of IQDF's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.1% of VOO's is in holdings IQDF also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 188 positions we hold weights for in IQDF and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, IQDF or VOO?
IQDF yields 2.98% while VOO yields 1.08%, so IQDF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than IQDF?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. IQDF led over 1Y and 3Y, VOO over 5Y and the full window. IQDF is less concentrated, with 19.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.