IQM vs TLG
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF vs Touchstone Large Company Growth ETF
Which is better, IQM or TLG?
IQM has been ahead.
IQM has a lower expense ratio. IQM led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IQM | TLG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50%Best | 0.67% |
| AUM | $66M | $92M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 279 | 73 |
| YTD Return | +1.62% | +2.45%Best |
| 1Y Return | +1.00% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.82% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.19% | - |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Touchstone Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Feb 25, 2020 | Mar 16, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
IQM vs TLG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IQM vs TLG Performance
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Touchstone Large Company Growth ETF (TLG) is an ETF from Touchstone Investments. Year to date, IQM is up 1.62% versus a gain of 2.45% for TLG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IQM charges 0.50% per year while TLG charges 0.67%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $67 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IQM currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for TLG.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 15 holdings in IQM and 35 in TLG, totalling 13.9% and 96.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 15 positions we hold weights for in IQM and 35 in TLG, against full books of 279 and 73.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IQM and TLG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IQM or TLG?
IQM has an expense ratio of 0.50% while TLG charges 0.67%. IQM is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, IQM or TLG?
IQM yields 0.00% while TLG yields 0.00%, so TLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TLG better than IQM?
IQM has a lower expense ratio. IQM led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.