IVSS vs IVV
Applied Finance IVS US SMID ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, IVSS or IVV?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVSS is less concentrated, with 15.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVSS | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $28M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.06% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 366 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +17.13%Best | +11.57% |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.71% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.80% |
| Top 10 Weight | 15.9%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | Applied Finance Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 3, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IVSS vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVSS vs IVV Performance
Applied Finance IVS US SMID ETF (IVSS) is an ETF from Applied Finance Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, IVSS is up 17.13% versus a gain of 11.57% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVSS charges 0.59% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVSS currently yields 0.06% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 357 holdings in IVSS and 505 in IVV, totalling 100.1% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 357 positions we hold weights for in IVSS and 505 in IVV, against full books of 366 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 495 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for IVSS (99.3% of the fund), and 336 for IVSS that do not appear in IVV (96.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVSS and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVSS or IVV?
IVSS has an expense ratio of 0.59% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVSS or IVV?
IVSS yields 0.06% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than IVSS?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVSS is less concentrated, with 15.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.