IVSX vs IVV
Applied Finance IVS International SMID ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, IVSX or IVV?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVSX is less concentrated, with 16.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVSX | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $5M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 248 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +2.42% | +13.85%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +18.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.50% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.34% |
| Top 10 Weight | 16.1%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | Applied Finance Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 19, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IVSX vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVSX vs IVV Performance
Applied Finance IVS International SMID ETF (IVSX) is an ETF from Applied Finance Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, IVSX is up 2.42% versus a gain of 13.85% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVSX charges 0.75% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVSX currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 248 holdings in IVSX and 490 in IVV, totalling 98.3% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 248 positions we hold weights for in IVSX and 490 in IVV, against full books of 248 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 482 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for IVSX (98.6% of the fund), and 0 for IVSX that do not appear in IVV (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVSX and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVSX or IVV?
IVSX has an expense ratio of 0.75% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVSX or IVV?
IVSX yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than IVSX?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVSX is less concentrated, with 16.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.