IVV vs JANH

IVV vs JANH

Which is better, IVV or JANH?

Large Cap Blend against Option Writing.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVJANH
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.79%
AUM$876.4B$14M
Dividend Yield1.06%6.15%
Holdings50814
YTD Return+11.57%Best+1.87%
1Y Return+17.57%Best+0.02%
3Y Return (annualized)+20.71%-
5Y Return (annualized)+12.80%-
Volatility (annualized)12.1%4.3%Best
Max Drawdown-18.8%-10.4%Best
$10,000 over 2.7 years$16,586Best$10,193
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Innovator ETFs Trust
CategoryEquityAlternative
StyleLarge Cap BlendOption Writing
InceptionMay 15, 2000Jan 2, 2024

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 2, 2024 to Sep 10, 2026 (2.7 years).

IVV vs JANH growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

IVV vs JANH Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January (JANH) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while JANH returned +0.02%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.57% versus a gain of 1.87% for JANH.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.1% compared with 4.3% for JANH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -10.4% for JANH. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while JANH charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $79 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 6.15% for JANH.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of IVV and JANH you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

IVVJANH

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or JANH?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while JANH charges 0.79%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, IVV or JANH?

Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs +0.02% for JANH, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, IVV or JANH?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.1% annualized versus 4.3% for JANH. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs JANH -10.4%.

Should I hold both IVV and JANH?

IVV and JANH have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or JANH?

IVV yields 1.06% while JANH yields 6.15%, so JANH currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is JANH better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.