JANH vs VYM
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, JANH or VYM?
Option Writing against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JANH | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $14M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 6.15% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 14 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +1.87% | +13.15%Best |
| 1Y Return | +0.02% | +17.82%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.99% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.16% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.3%Best | 10.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -10.4%Best | -14.5% |
| $10,000 over 2.7 years | $10,193 | $15,417Best |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jan 2, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 2, 2024 to Sep 10, 2026 (2.7 years).
JANH vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
JANH vs VYM Performance
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January (JANH) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year JANH returned +0.02% while VYM returned +17.82%. Year to date, JANH is up 1.87% versus a gain of 13.15% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.3% compared with 4.3% for JANH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.4% for JANH and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JANH charges 0.79% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $4 annually, a gap of $75 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JANH currently yields 6.15% against 2.22% for VYM.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of JANH and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JANH or VYM?
JANH has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $75 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, JANH or VYM?
Over the past year JANH returned +0.02% vs +17.82% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, JANH or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 10.3% annualized versus 4.3% for JANH. Worst drawdown: JANH -10.4% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both JANH and VYM?
JANH and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, JANH or VYM?
JANH yields 6.15% while VYM yields 2.22%, so JANH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than JANH?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.