IVV vs JEMA
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. JEMA delivered stronger 1-year returns. JEMA offers more diversification with 517 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | JEMA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.34% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $1.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 2.41% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 517 | |
| YTD Return | +14.29% | +22.84% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.79% | +42.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.19% | +23.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | +7.67% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 17.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -39.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 10, 2021 |
IVV vs JEMA Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JEMA) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Over the past year IVV returned +21.79% while JEMA returned +42.43%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.29% versus a gain of 22.84% for JEMA.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.19% per year against +23.53% for JEMA; over five years the annualized figures are +13.28% and +7.67% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.06% annualized vs +6.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JEMA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -39.5% for JEMA. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while JEMA charges 0.34%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $34 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 2.41% for JEMA.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or JEMA?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while JEMA charges 0.34%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $31 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or JEMA?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.79% vs +42.43% for JEMA, so JEMA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +7.06% vs +6.55% for JEMA. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or JEMA?
JEMA has been the more volatile fund at 17.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs JEMA -39.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and JEMA?
IVV and JEMA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and JEMA?
IVV and JEMA share 2 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 963 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or JEMA?
IVV yields 1.10% while JEMA yields 2.41%, so JEMA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.