IVV vs JEMB
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Janus Henderson Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | JEMB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.52% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $476M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 6.95% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 343 | |
| YTD Return | +12.96% | +3.17% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.70% | +7.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.10% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.40% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 5.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -5.4% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Janus Henderson Investors | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 13, 2024 |
IVV vs JEMB Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Janus Henderson Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (JEMB) is a ETF from Janus Henderson Investors. Over the past year IVV returned +20.70% while JEMB returned +7.89%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.96% versus a gain of 3.17% for JEMB.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 5.6% for JEMB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -5.4% for JEMB. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while JEMB charges 0.52%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $52 annually, a gap of $49 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 6.95% for JEMB.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and JEMB share 0 holdings out of 601 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or JEMB?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while JEMB charges 0.52%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $49 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or JEMB?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.70% vs +7.89% for JEMB, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.01% vs +9.42% for JEMB. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or JEMB?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 5.6% for JEMB. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs JEMB -5.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and JEMB?
IVV and JEMB have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and JEMB?
IVV and JEMB share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 601 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or JEMB?
IVV yields 1.10% while JEMB yields 6.95%, so JEMB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.