IVV vs JPRF
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs JPMorgan Preferred and Income Securities ETF
Which is better, IVV or JPRF?
Large Cap Blend against Preferred Stock.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | JPRF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.55% |
| AUM | $886.7B | $2.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 194 |
| YTD Return | +12.70%Best | -0.63% |
| 1Y Return | +19.36% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.16% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.75% | - |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Allocation/Balanced |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Preferred Stock |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 10, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
IVV vs JPRF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs JPRF Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and JPMorgan Preferred and Income Securities ETF (JPRF) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Year to date, IVV is up 12.70% versus a loss of 0.63% for JPRF.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while JPRF charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $55 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.00% for JPRF.
Holdings Overlap
At least 2.3% of IVV's money is in holdings JPRF also owns.
Stated as a floor: for JPRF, our book for it covers 13.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
IVV and JPRF share little of their money.
11 positions in common, counted across the 504 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 22 in JPRF, against full books of 508 and 194.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in JPRF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| WFCWells Fargo & Co | 0.41% | 1.96% | 1.55% |
| CCitigroup Inc 6.875 11/73 6.88 2173-11-15 | 0.35% | 1.16% | 0.81% |
| BACBank Of America Corp Preferred Stock 6.5 | 0.62% | 0.28% | 0.34% |
| FITBFifth Third Bancorp | 0.08% | 0.63% | 0.55% |
| BKBank Of New York Mellon Corp/The Bk Us Equity | 0.16% | 0.37% | 0.21% |
| TFCTruist Financial Corp. | 0.10% | 0.41% | 0.31% |
| USBUs Bancorp | 0.15% | 0.32% | 0.17% |
| CMSCms Energy Corp. | 0.03% | 0.42% | 0.39% |
| COFCapital One Financial Corp. | 0.21% | 0.20% | 0.01% |
| CFGCitizens Financial Group Inc | 0.05% | 0.18% | 0.13% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and JPRF you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or JPRF?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while JPRF charges 0.55%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $52 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and JPRF?
At least 2.3% of IVV's money is in holdings JPRF also owns. Our book for JPRF is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 504 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 22 in JPRF.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or JPRF?
IVV yields 1.10% while JPRF yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is JPRF better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.