IVV vs KJUN
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Innovator US Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - June
Which is better, IVV or KJUN?
Large Cap Blend against Multi Alternative.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | KJUN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.79% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $60M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 12 |
| YTD Return | +12.27%Best | +4.70% |
| 1Y Return | +17.04%Best | +8.17% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.24% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.08% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.9% | 7.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8% | -14.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.3 years | $14,897Best | $11,629 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 3, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 3, 2024 to Sep 17, 2026 (2.3 years).
IVV vs KJUN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.
IVV vs KJUN Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Innovator US Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - June (KJUN) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +17.04% while KJUN returned +8.17%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.27% versus a gain of 4.70% for KJUN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.9% compared with 7.5% for KJUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -14.4% for KJUN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while KJUN charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $79 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for KJUN.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and KJUN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or KJUN?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while KJUN charges 0.79%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or KJUN?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.04% vs +8.17% for KJUN, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +18.92% vs +6.78% for KJUN. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or KJUN?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 11.9% annualized versus 7.5% for KJUN. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs KJUN -14.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and KJUN?
IVV and KJUN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or KJUN?
IVV yields 1.06% while KJUN yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is KJUN better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.