IVV vs KRE
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. KRE delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | KRE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.35% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $4.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 2.10% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 161 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | +15.85% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.94% | +23.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.81% | +22.02% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | +5.74% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 26.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -71.2% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 19, 2006 |
IVV vs KRE Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and State Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% while KRE returned +23.35%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.28% versus a gain of 15.85% for KRE.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.81% per year against +22.02% for KRE; over five years the annualized figures are +13.05% and +5.74% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.98% annualized vs +2.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KRE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -71.2% for KRE. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while KRE charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $35 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 2.10% for KRE.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and KRE share 5 holdings out of 660 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or KRE?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while KRE charges 0.35%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or KRE?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% vs +23.35% for KRE, so KRE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs +2.95% for KRE. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or KRE?
KRE has been the more volatile fund at 26.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs KRE -71.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and KRE?
IVV and KRE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and KRE?
IVV and KRE share 5 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 660 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or KRE?
IVV yields 1.10% while KRE yields 2.10%, so KRE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.