IVV vs KYN
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, Inc.
Which is better, IVV or KYN?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, KYN over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 77.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | KYN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 10.00% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $3.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 5.95% |
| Holdings | 508 | 36 |
| YTD Return | +12.24% | +27.29%Best |
| 1Y Return | +18.61% | +32.23%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.98% | +31.09%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.76% | +24.10%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.8%Best | 30.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5%Best | -95.1% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,230 | $29,435Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 77.5% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 28, 2004 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 28, 2004 to Sep 9, 2026 (21.9 years).
IVV vs KYN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 21.9 years both funds cover.
IVV vs KYN Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (KYN) is an ETF from Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors. Over the past year IVV returned +18.61% while KYN returned +32.23%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.24% versus a gain of 27.29% for KYN.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.98% per year against +31.09% for KYN; over five years the annualized figures are +12.76% and +24.10% respectively. Across the full 22-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +9.56% annualized vs -0.13%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KYN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.1% compared with 14.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -95.1% for KYN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while KYN charges 10.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $1000 annually, a gap of $997 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 5.95% for KYN.
Holdings Overlap
1.1% of IVV's money is in holdings KYN also owns. 33.2% of KYN's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 248 days apart, IVV as of Aug 5, 2026 and KYN as of Nov 30, 2025, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
8 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 23 in KYN, against full books of 508 and 36.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 11 positions for KYN that do not appear in our book for IVV (48.4% of the fund), and 488 for IVV that do not appear in KYN (98.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in KYN | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| APPApplovin Corp., Class 'A' | 0.17% | 10.66% | 10.49% |
| KMIKinder Morgan In | 0.09% | 7.69% | 7.60% |
| OKEOneok Inc. | 0.08% | 5.97% | 5.89% |
| TRGPTarga Resources Corp. | 0.08% | 3.76% | 3.68% |
| SRESempra Common Stock | 0.08% | 1.93% | 1.85% |
| LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares | 0.34% | 1.02% | 0.68% |
| ETREntergy Corp 4(2) Disc Nt* | 0.07% | 1.21% | 1.14% |
| PWRQuanta | 0.15% | 0.98% | 0.83% |
33.2% of KYN is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or KYN?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while KYN charges 10.00%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $997 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or KYN?
Over the past year IVV returned +18.61% vs +32.23% for KYN, so KYN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (22 years), IVV annualized +9.56% vs -0.13% for KYN. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or KYN?
KYN has been the more volatile fund at 30.1% annualized versus 14.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs KYN -95.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and KYN?
IVV and KYN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and KYN?
33.2% of KYN's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 33.2% of KYN's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 23 in KYN.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or KYN?
IVV yields 1.06% while KYN yields 5.95%, so KYN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is KYN better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, KYN over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 77.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.