IVV vs KYN
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, Inc.
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. KYN delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | KYN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 10.00% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $3.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 6.18% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 36 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | +23.81% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | +28.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | +29.01% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | +23.38% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 30.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -95.1% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 28, 2004 |
IVV vs KYN Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (KYN) is a ETF from Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors. Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while KYN returned +28.71%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a gain of 23.81% for KYN.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.47% per year against +29.01% for KYN; over five years the annualized figures are +13.26% and +23.38% respectively. Across the full 22-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.03% annualized vs -0.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KYN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -95.1% for KYN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while KYN charges 10.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $1000 annually, a gap of $997 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 6.18% for KYN.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and KYN share 8 holdings out of 520 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or KYN?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while KYN charges 10.00%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $997 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or KYN?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs +28.71% for KYN, so KYN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (22 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs -0.26% for KYN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or KYN?
KYN has been the more volatile fund at 30.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs KYN -95.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and KYN?
IVV and KYN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and KYN?
IVV and KYN share 8 common holdings with a 1.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 520 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or KYN?
IVV yields 1.09% while KYN yields 6.18%, so KYN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.