IVV vs LABX

IVV vs LABX

Which is better, IVV or LABX?

Large Cap Blend against Trading-Leveraged Equity.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVLABX
Expense Ratio0.03%Best1.30%
AUM$876.4B$50M
Dividend Yield1.06%0.00%
Holdings5084
YTD Return+12.39%Best-36.70%
1Y Return+16.61%Best-75.85%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.38%-
5Y Return (annualized)+13.51%-
Volatility (annualized)12.9%Best314.4%
Max Drawdown-8.9%Best-96.4%
$10,000 over 1.1 years$12,020Best$3,925
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Tradr ETFs
CategoryEquityAlternative
StyleLarge Cap BlendTrading-Leveraged Equity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Aug 11, 2025

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 12, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.1 years).

IVV vs LABX growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

IVV vs LABX Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Tradr 2X Long ALAB Daily ETF (LABX) is an ETF from Tradr ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while LABX returned -75.85%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a loss of 36.70% for LABX.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

LABX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 314.4% compared with 12.9% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for IVV and -96.4% for LABX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.41. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while LABX charges 1.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $130 annually, a gap of $127 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for LABX.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of IVV and LABX you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

IVVLABX

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or LABX?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while LABX charges 1.30%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $127 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, IVV or LABX?

Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs -75.85% for LABX, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +18.21% vs -57.27% for LABX. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, IVV or LABX?

LABX has been the more volatile fund at 314.4% annualized versus 12.9% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -8.9% vs LABX -96.4%.

Should I hold both IVV and LABX?

IVV and LABX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.41, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or LABX?

IVV yields 1.06% while LABX yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is LABX better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.