LABX vs VXUS

LABX vs VXUS

Which is better, LABX or VXUS?

Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.

VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VXUSHigher Returns: VXUS

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricLABXVXUS
Expense Ratio1.30%0.05%Best
AUM$50M$158.1B
Dividend Yield0.00%2.51%
Holdings48,747
YTD Return-40.61%+13.64%Best
1Y Return-77.03%+20.82%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+19.58%
5Y Return (annualized)-+9.14%
Volatility (annualized)315.1%13.6%Best
Max Drawdown-96.4%-11.3%Best
$10,000 over 1.1 years$3,673$12,543Best
Fund FamilyTradr ETFsVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleTrading-Leveraged EquityLarge Cap Blend
InceptionAug 11, 2025Jan 26, 2011

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 12, 2025 to Sep 17, 2026 (1.1 years).

LABX vs VXUS growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

LABX vs VXUS Performance

Tradr 2X Long ALAB Daily ETF (LABX) is an ETF from Tradr ETFs and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LABX returned -77.03% while VXUS returned +20.82%. Year to date, LABX is down 40.61% versus a gain of 13.64% for VXUS.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

LABX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 315.1% compared with 13.6% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -96.4% for LABX and -11.3% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.03. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

LABX charges 1.30% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $130 vs $5 annually, a gap of $125 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LABX currently yields 0.00% against 2.51% for VXUS.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of LABX and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

LABXVXUS

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, LABX or VXUS?

LABX has an expense ratio of 1.30% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $125 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, LABX or VXUS?

Over the past year LABX returned -77.03% vs +20.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), LABX annualized -59.77% vs +22.87% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, LABX or VXUS?

LABX has been the more volatile fund at 315.1% annualized versus 13.6% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: LABX -96.4% vs VXUS -11.3%.

Should I hold both LABX and VXUS?

LABX and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.03, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, LABX or VXUS?

LABX yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VXUS better than LABX?

VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.