IVV vs LAYS
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs STKd 100% NVDA & 100% AMD ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. LAYS delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | LAYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.29% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $6M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 15.43% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 5 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | +33.00% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.94% | +413.40% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.81% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 115.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -47.2% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Quantify Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 5, 2025 |
IVV vs LAYS Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and STKd 100% NVDA & 100% AMD ETF (LAYS) is a ETF from Quantify Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% while LAYS returned +413.40%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.28% versus a gain of 33.00% for LAYS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LAYS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 115.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -47.2% for LAYS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while LAYS charges 1.29%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $129 annually, a gap of $126 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 15.43% for LAYS.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and LAYS share 0 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or LAYS?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while LAYS charges 1.29%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $126 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or LAYS?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% vs +413.40% for LAYS, so LAYS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs +236.85% for LAYS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or LAYS?
LAYS has been the more volatile fund at 115.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs LAYS -47.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and LAYS?
IVV and LAYS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and LAYS?
IVV and LAYS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or LAYS?
IVV yields 1.10% while LAYS yields 15.43%, so LAYS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.