IVV vs LKOR
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs FlexShares Credit-Scored US Long Corporate Bond Index Fund
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. LKOR offers more diversification with 832 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | LKOR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.15% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $30M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 5.92% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 832 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | -5.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.94% | -4.13% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.81% | +3.71% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | -3.99% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 27.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -42.4% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Flexshares Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 23, 2015 |
IVV vs LKOR Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and FlexShares Credit-Scored US Long Corporate Bond Index Fund (LKOR) is a ETF from Flexshares Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% while LKOR returned -4.13%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.28% versus a loss of 5.64% for LKOR.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.81% per year against +3.71% for LKOR; over five years the annualized figures are +13.05% and -3.99% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.98% annualized vs +2.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LKOR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -42.4% for LKOR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.11. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while LKOR charges 0.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $15 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 5.92% for LKOR.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and LKOR share 0 holdings out of 1280 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or LKOR?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while LKOR charges 0.15%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or LKOR?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% vs -4.13% for LKOR, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs +2.14% for LKOR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or LKOR?
LKOR has been the more volatile fund at 27.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs LKOR -42.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and LKOR?
IVV and LKOR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.11, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and LKOR?
IVV and LKOR share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1280 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or LKOR?
IVV yields 1.10% while LKOR yields 5.92%, so LKOR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.