IVV vs LOCT

IVV vs LOCT

Which is better, IVV or LOCT?

Large Cap Blend against Multi Alternative.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVLOCT
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.79%
AUM$876.4B$11M
Dividend Yield1.06%5.16%
Holdings50810
YTD Return+12.39%Best+0.06%
1Y Return+16.61%Best+1.40%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.38%Best+0.16%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.51%-
Volatility (annualized)12.4%6.0%Best
Max Drawdown-18.8%-10.5%Best
$10,000 over 3 years$18,663Best$10,048
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Innovator ETFs Trust
CategoryEquityAlternative
StyleLarge Cap BlendMulti Alternative
InceptionMay 15, 2000Oct 2, 2023

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 2, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (3 years).

IVV vs LOCT growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

IVV vs LOCT Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - October (LOCT) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while LOCT returned +1.40%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 0.06% for LOCT.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.38% per year against +0.16% for LOCT.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.4% compared with 6.0% for LOCT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -10.5% for LOCT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.05. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while LOCT charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $79 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 5.16% for LOCT.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of IVV and LOCT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

IVVLOCT

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or LOCT?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while LOCT charges 0.79%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, IVV or LOCT?

Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs +1.40% for LOCT, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, IVV or LOCT?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.4% annualized versus 6.0% for LOCT. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs LOCT -10.5%.

Should I hold both IVV and LOCT?

IVV and LOCT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.05, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or LOCT?

IVV yields 1.06% while LOCT yields 5.16%, so LOCT currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is LOCT better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.