IVV vs MAGC
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MAGC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.59% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $14M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 5.74% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 17 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | -21.83% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | -26.81% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 28.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -44.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Roundhill Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 3, 2024 |
IVV vs MAGC Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while MAGC returned -26.81%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a loss of 21.83% for MAGC.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MAGC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -44.3% for MAGC. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.05. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MAGC charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $59 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 5.74% for MAGC.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and MAGC share 0 holdings out of 513 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MAGC?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MAGC charges 0.59%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or MAGC?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs -26.81% for MAGC, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs -13.03% for MAGC. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or MAGC?
MAGC has been the more volatile fund at 28.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs MAGC -44.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and MAGC?
IVV and MAGC have a monthly-return correlation of -0.05, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MAGC?
IVV and MAGC share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 513 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MAGC?
IVV yields 1.09% while MAGC yields 5.74%, so MAGC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.