MAGC vs VYM
Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MAGC | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $14M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.74% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 17 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -19.90% | +16.53% | |
| 1Y Return | -22.26% | +25.03% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.25% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.2% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -44.3% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 3, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
MAGC vs VYM Performance
Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MAGC returned -22.26% while VYM returned +25.03%. Year to date, MAGC is down 19.90% versus a gain of 16.53% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MAGC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.2% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.3% for MAGC and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.13. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MAGC charges 0.59% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $4 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MAGC currently yields 5.74% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
MAGC and VYM share 0 holdings out of 566 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MAGC or VYM?
MAGC has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MAGC or VYM?
Over the past year MAGC returned -22.26% vs +25.03% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MAGC annualized -11.90% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MAGC or VYM?
MAGC has been the more volatile fund at 28.2% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: MAGC -44.3% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both MAGC and VYM?
MAGC and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.13, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MAGC and VYM?
MAGC and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 566 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MAGC or VYM?
MAGC yields 5.74% while VYM yields 2.86%, so MAGC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.