IVV vs MANI
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Man Active Income ETF
Which is better, IVV or MANI?
Large Cap Blend against Investment Grade Bond.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MANI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.85% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $22M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 4.66% |
| Holdings | 508 | 89 |
| YTD Return | +12.27%Best | +6.42% |
| 1Y Return | +17.04%Best | +9.09% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.24% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.08% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.3% | 1.7%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Man Solutions LLC |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Investment Grade Bond |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 16, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
IVV vs MANI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs MANI Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Man Active Income ETF (MANI) is an ETF from Man Solutions LLC. Over the past year IVV returned +17.04% while MANI returned +9.09%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.27% versus a gain of 6.42% for MANI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.3% compared with 1.7% for MANI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MANI charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $85 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 4.66% for MANI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 490 holdings in IVV and 11 in MANI, totalling 99.3% and 10.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 11 in MANI, against full books of 508 and 89.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and MANI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MANI?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MANI charges 0.85%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $82 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or MANI?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.04% vs +9.09% for MANI, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or MANI?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 13.3% annualized versus 1.7% for MANI.
Should I hold both IVV and MANI?
IVV and MANI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MANI?
IVV yields 1.06% while MANI yields 4.66%, so MANI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MANI better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.