MANI vs VYM
Man Active Income ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, MANI or VYM?
Investment Grade Bond against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MANI | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $22M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.66% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 89 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +6.42% | +12.29%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.09% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.42% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.12% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.7%Best | 9.9% |
| Fund Family | Man Solutions LLC | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Investment Grade Bond | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
MANI vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
MANI vs VYM Performance
Man Active Income ETF (MANI) is an ETF from Man Solutions LLC and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MANI returned +9.09% while VYM returned +16.61%. Year to date, MANI is up 6.42% versus a gain of 12.29% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 9.9% compared with 1.7% for MANI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MANI charges 0.85% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $4 annually, a gap of $81 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MANI currently yields 4.66% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 11 holdings in MANI and 557 in VYM, totalling 10.8% and 99.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 11 positions we hold weights for in MANI and 557 in VYM, against full books of 89 and 613.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MANI and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MANI or VYM?
MANI has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $81 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MANI or VYM?
Over the past year MANI returned +9.09% vs +16.61% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MANI or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 9.9% annualized versus 1.7% for MANI.
Should I hold both MANI and VYM?
MANI and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, MANI or VYM?
MANI yields 4.66% while VYM yields 2.22%, so MANI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than MANI?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.