IVV vs MCI

IVV vs MCI

Which is better, IVV or MCI?

We do not have enough on IVV and MCI to separate them.

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVMCI
Expense Ratio0.03%-
AUM$876.4B-
Dividend Yield1.06%-
Holdings508-
YTD Price Return+10.98%-
1Y Price Return+16.18%-
3Y Price Return (annualized)+19.10%-
5Y Price Return (annualized)+11.22%-
Volatility (annualized)15.1%-
Max Drawdown-56.5%-
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)BARINGS CORPORATE INVESTORS
CategoryEquity-
StyleLarge Cap Blend-
InceptionMay 15, 2000-

Not shown on this pair: $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions, because our data feed carries no adjusted close for MCI. We have no price series for MCI, so there is nothing to compare it against.

IVV vs MCI Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and BARINGS CORPORATE INVESTORS (MCI) is an ETF from BARINGS CORPORATE INVESTORS.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of IVV and MCI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

IVVMCI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is MCI better than IVV?

We hold very little data on IVV and MCI, so there is not enough here to separate them. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.