IVV vs MFL

IVV vs MFL

Which is better, IVV or MFL?

We do not have enough on IVV and MFL to separate them.

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVMFL
Expense Ratio0.03%-
AUM$886.7B-
Dividend Yield1.10%-
Holdings508-
YTD Price Return+13.25%-
1Y Price Return+20.14%-
3Y Price Return (annualized)+19.86%-
5Y Price Return (annualized)+11.30%-
Volatility (annualized)15.1%-
Max Drawdown-56.5%-
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)BlackRock MuniHoldings Investment Quality Fund
CategoryEquity-
StyleLarge Cap Blend-
InceptionMay 15, 2000-

Not shown on this pair: $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions, because our data feed carries no adjusted close for MFL. We have no price series for MFL, so there is nothing to compare it against.

IVV vs MFL Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and BlackRock MuniHoldings Investment Quality Fund (MFL) is an ETF from BlackRock MuniHoldings Investment Quality Fund.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of IVV and MFL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

IVVMFL

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is MFL better than IVV?

We hold very little data on IVV and MFL, so there is not enough here to separate them. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.