IVV vs MHN

IVV vs MHN

Which is better, IVV or MHN?

We do not have enough on IVV and MHN to separate them.

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVMHN
Expense Ratio0.03%-
AUM$882.6B-
Dividend Yield1.06%-
Holdings508-
YTD Price Return+13.42%-
1Y Price Return+15.32%-
3Y Price Return (annualized)+21.75%-
5Y Price Return (annualized)+12.35%-
Volatility (annualized)15.1%-
Max Drawdown-56.5%-
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)BlackRock MuniHoldings New York Quality Fund, Inc.
CategoryEquity-
StyleLarge Cap Blend-
InceptionMay 15, 2000-

Not shown on this pair: $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions, because our data feed carries no adjusted close for MHN. We have no price series for MHN, so there is nothing to compare it against.

IVV vs MHN Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and BlackRock MuniHoldings New York Quality Fund, Inc. (MHN) is an ETF from BlackRock MuniHoldings New York Quality Fund, Inc..

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of IVV and MHN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

IVVMHN

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is MHN better than IVV?

We hold very little data on IVV and MHN, so there is not enough here to separate them. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.