IVV vs MJUN
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (June) ETF
Which is better, IVV or MJUN?
Large Cap Blend against Option Writing.
IVV has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MJUN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.49% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $2M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 1 |
| YTD Return | +11.51%Best | +1.99% |
| 1Y Return | +15.96% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.01% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.66% | - |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Pacer ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Option Writing |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 11, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
IVV vs MJUN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs MJUN Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (June) ETF (MJUN) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs. Year to date, IVV is up 11.51% versus a gain of 1.99% for MJUN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MJUN charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $49 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for MJUN.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 490 holdings in IVV and 1 in MJUN, totalling 99.3% and 3.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 1 in MJUN, against full books of 508 and 1.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and MJUN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MJUN?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MJUN charges 0.49%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MJUN?
IVV yields 1.06% while MJUN yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MJUN better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.