IVV vs MKOR
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Matthews Korea Active ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. MKOR delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MKOR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.79% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $137M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.81% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 47 | |
| YTD Return | +14.29% | +71.58% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.79% | +127.15% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.19% | +39.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 37.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -29.4% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Matthews Asia Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 29, 2010 |
IVV vs MKOR Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR) is a ETF from Matthews Asia Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +21.79% while MKOR returned +127.15%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.29% versus a gain of 71.58% for MKOR.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.19% per year against +39.55% for MKOR. Across the full 3-year window we track, MKOR has the edge at +34.97% annualized vs +7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MKOR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 37.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -29.4% for MKOR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MKOR charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $79 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 1.81% for MKOR.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and MKOR share 0 holdings out of 556 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MKOR?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MKOR charges 0.79%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or MKOR?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.79% vs +127.15% for MKOR, so MKOR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +7.06% vs +34.97% for MKOR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or MKOR?
MKOR has been the more volatile fund at 37.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs MKOR -29.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and MKOR?
IVV and MKOR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MKOR?
IVV and MKOR share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 556 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MKOR?
IVV yields 1.10% while MKOR yields 1.81%, so MKOR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.