IVV vs MKOR
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Matthews Korea Active ETF
Which is better, IVV or MKOR?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. MKOR led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MKOR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.79% |
| AUM | $886.7B | $139M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.81% |
| Holdings | 508 | 53 |
| YTD Return | +13.86% | +70.61%Best |
| 1Y Return | +21.57% | +128.36%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.48% | +38.90%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.88% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.7%Best | 36.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -29.4% |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $17,739 | $24,793Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Matthews Asia Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 29, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 17, 2023 to Sep 3, 2026 (3.1 years).
IVV vs MKOR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.
IVV vs MKOR Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR) is an ETF from Matthews Asia Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +21.57% while MKOR returned +128.36%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.86% versus a gain of 70.61% for MKOR.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.48% per year against +38.90% for MKOR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MKOR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 36.5% compared with 12.7% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -29.4% for MKOR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MKOR charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $79 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 1.81% for MKOR.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 505 holdings in IVV and 51 in MKOR, totalling 100.0% and 93.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 51 in MKOR, against full books of 508 and 53.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and MKOR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MKOR?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MKOR charges 0.79%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or MKOR?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.57% vs +128.36% for MKOR, so MKOR leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or MKOR?
MKOR has been the more volatile fund at 36.5% annualized versus 12.7% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs MKOR -29.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and MKOR?
IVV and MKOR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MKOR?
IVV yields 1.10% while MKOR yields 1.81%, so MKOR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MKOR better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. MKOR led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.