IVV vs MLDR
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Global X Intermediate-Term Treasury Ladder ETF
Which is better, IVV or MLDR?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MLDR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.12% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $9M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 3.87% |
| Holdings | 508 | 70 |
| YTD Return | +12.39%Best | -2.46% |
| 1Y Return | +16.61%Best | -1.62% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.38% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.51% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.7% | 3.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8% | -4.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $14,218Best | $10,052 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | - |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 9, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 10, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (2 years).
IVV vs MLDR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
IVV vs MLDR Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Global X Intermediate-Term Treasury Ladder ETF (MLDR) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while MLDR returned -1.62%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a loss of 2.46% for MLDR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.7% compared with 3.9% for MLDR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -4.5% for MLDR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.16. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MLDR charges 0.12%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $12 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 3.87% for MLDR.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and MLDR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MLDR?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MLDR charges 0.12%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or MLDR?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs -1.62% for MLDR, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +19.24% vs +0.26% for MLDR. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or MLDR?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.7% annualized versus 3.9% for MLDR. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs MLDR -4.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and MLDR?
IVV and MLDR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.16, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MLDR?
IVV yields 1.06% while MLDR yields 3.87%, so MLDR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MLDR better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.