IVV vs MSFL
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MSFL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.15% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $124M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 2 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +0.31% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.01% | -20.48% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.77% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.39% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 61.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -62.1% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | GraniteShares | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 4, 2024 |
IVV vs MSFL Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) is a ETF from GraniteShares. Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% while MSFL returned -20.48%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 0.31% for MSFL.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSFL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 61.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -62.1% for MSFL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MSFL charges 1.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $115 annually, a gap of $112 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for MSFL.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and MSFL share 1 holdings out of 505 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in MSFL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFT | 4.57% | 66.65% | 62.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MSFL?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MSFL charges 1.15%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $112 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or MSFL?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% vs -20.48% for MSFL, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +0.81% for MSFL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or MSFL?
MSFL has been the more volatile fund at 61.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs MSFL -62.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and MSFL?
IVV and MSFL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MSFL?
IVV and MSFL share 1 common holdings with a 4.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 505 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MSFL?
IVV yields 1.09% while MSFL yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.