IVV vs MSTW
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MSTW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.99% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $36M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 422.04% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 3 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | -60.91% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | -87.44% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 73.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -89.1% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Roundhill Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 24, 2025 |
IVV vs MSTW Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF (MSTW) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while MSTW returned -87.44%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a loss of 60.91% for MSTW.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSTW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 73.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -89.1% for MSTW. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MSTW charges 0.99%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $99 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 422.04% for MSTW.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and MSTW share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MSTW?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MSTW charges 0.99%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $96 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or MSTW?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs -87.44% for MSTW, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs -87.03% for MSTW. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or MSTW?
MSTW has been the more volatile fund at 73.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs MSTW -89.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and MSTW?
IVV and MSTW have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MSTW?
IVV and MSTW share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MSTW?
IVV yields 1.09% while MSTW yields 422.04%, so MSTW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.