IVV vs MUD
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MUD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.02% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $34M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 11.41% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 9 | |
| YTD Return | +13.25% | -79.34% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.95% | -92.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.26% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.82% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 67.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -97.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 10, 2024 |
IVV vs MUD Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X ETF (MUD) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +19.95% while MUD returned -92.92%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.25% versus a loss of 79.34% for MUD.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MUD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 67.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -97.0% for MUD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.59. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MUD charges 1.02%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $102 annually, a gap of $99 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 11.41% for MUD.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and MUD share 0 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MUD?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MUD charges 1.02%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $99 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or MUD?
Over the past year IVV returned +19.95% vs -92.92% for MUD, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.01% vs -80.27% for MUD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or MUD?
MUD has been the more volatile fund at 67.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs MUD -97.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and MUD?
IVV and MUD have a monthly-return correlation of -0.59, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MUD?
IVV and MUD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MUD?
IVV yields 1.10% while MUD yields 11.41%, so MUD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.