IVV vs MUNG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Northern Trust 2046 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF
Which is better, IVV or MUNG?
Large Cap Blend against Long Term Municipal Bond.
IVV has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MUNG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.18% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $10M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 13 |
| YTD Return | +11.03%Best | -2.32% |
| 1Y Return | +15.62% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.81% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.61% | - |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Northern Trust Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Long Term Municipal Bond |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 25, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
IVV vs MUNG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs MUNG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Northern Trust 2046 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF (MUNG) is an ETF from Northern Trust Asset Management. Year to date, IVV is up 11.03% versus a loss of 2.32% for MUNG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MUNG charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $18 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for MUNG.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 490 holdings in IVV and 13 in MUNG, totalling 99.3% and 5.4% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 13 in MUNG, against full books of 508 and 13.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and MUNG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MUNG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MUNG charges 0.18%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MUNG?
IVV yields 1.06% while MUNG yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MUNG better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.