IVV vs MYLD
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Cambria Micro and SmallCap Shareholder Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. MYLD delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MYLD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.09% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $34M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 2.18% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 102 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | +25.77% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | +35.55% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 17.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -28.2% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Cambria Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 4, 2024 |
IVV vs MYLD Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Cambria Micro and SmallCap Shareholder Yield ETF (MYLD) is a ETF from Cambria Investment Management. Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while MYLD returned +35.55%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a gain of 25.77% for MYLD.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MYLD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -28.2% for MYLD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MYLD charges 1.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $109 annually, a gap of $106 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 2.18% for MYLD.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and MYLD share 0 holdings out of 606 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MYLD?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MYLD charges 1.09%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $106 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or MYLD?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs +35.55% for MYLD, so MYLD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs +12.15% for MYLD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or MYLD?
MYLD has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs MYLD -28.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and MYLD?
IVV and MYLD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MYLD?
IVV and MYLD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 606 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MYLD?
IVV yields 1.09% while MYLD yields 2.18%, so MYLD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.