IVV vs NICO
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Hexis Active Nicotine Engagement ETF
Which is better, IVV or NICO?
Large Cap Blend against All Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NICO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.70% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $2M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 12 |
| YTD Return | +13.32%Best | -0.92% |
| 1Y Return | +17.08% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.72% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.20% | - |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Hexis Capital Management Ltd. |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | All Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 6, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
IVV vs NICO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs NICO Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Hexis Active Nicotine Engagement ETF (NICO) is an ETF from Hexis Capital Management Ltd.. Year to date, IVV is up 13.32% versus a loss of 0.92% for NICO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NICO charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $70 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for NICO.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.6% of IVV's money is in holdings NICO also owns.
Stated as a floor: for NICO, our book for it covers 65.5% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
2 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 12 in NICO, against full books of 508 and 12.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and NICO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NICO?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NICO charges 0.70%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NICO?
IVV yields 1.06% while NICO yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NICO better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.