IVV vs NODE
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs VanEck Onchain Economy ETF
Which is better, IVV or NODE?
NODE has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. NODE led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NODE |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.67% |
| AUM | $886.7B | $58M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.86% |
| Holdings | 508 | 49 |
| YTD Return | +13.39%Best | +11.29% |
| 1Y Return | +20.08% | +23.04%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.29% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.88% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.9%Best | 43.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.9%Best | -36.0% |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $13,283 | $15,379Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 54.5% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | VanEck |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 13, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 14, 2025 to Sep 4, 2026 (1.3 years).
IVV vs NODE growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
IVV vs NODE Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE) is an ETF from VanEck. Over the past year IVV returned +20.08% while NODE returned +23.04%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.39% versus a gain of 11.29% for NODE.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NODE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 43.2% compared with 11.9% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for IVV and -36.0% for NODE. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NODE charges 0.67%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $67 annually, a gap of $64 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.86% for NODE.
Holdings Overlap
8.6% of IVV's money is in holdings NODE also owns. 10.5% of NODE's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
NODE and IVV share little of their money.
8 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 48 in NODE, against full books of 508 and 49.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 24 positions for NODE that do not appear in our book for IVV (62.3% of the fund), and 489 for IVV that do not appear in NODE (90.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in NODE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.98% | 1.15% | 6.83% |
| SQBlock Inc | 0.07% | 2.20% | 2.13% |
| VRTVertiv Co. | 0.16% | 1.34% | 1.18% |
| NRGNrg Energy | 0.04% | 1.42% | 1.38% |
| VSTVistra Energy Corp. | 0.07% | 1.23% | 1.16% |
| COINCoinbase Globa-A | 0.05% | 1.22% | 1.17% |
| HOODRobinhood Markets Inc - A | 0.11% | 1.05% | 0.94% |
| CEGConstellation Energy Corporation Com | 0.13% | 0.89% | 0.76% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and NODE you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NODE?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NODE charges 0.67%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $64 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or NODE?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.08% vs +23.04% for NODE, so NODE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +24.41% vs +39.25% for NODE. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or NODE?
NODE has been the more volatile fund at 43.2% annualized versus 11.9% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -8.9% vs NODE -36.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and NODE?
IVV and NODE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NODE?
10.5% of NODE's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 10.5% of NODE's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 48 in NODE.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NODE?
IVV yields 1.10% while NODE yields 0.86%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NODE better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. NODE led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.