IVV vs NODE
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs VanEck Onchain Economy ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NODE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.67% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $58M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.86% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 64 | |
| YTD Return | +14.29% | +3.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.79% | +11.84% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.19% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 44.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -36.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | VanEck | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 13, 2025 |
IVV vs NODE Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE) is a ETF from VanEck. Over the past year IVV returned +21.79% while NODE returned +11.84%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.29% versus a gain of 3.23% for NODE.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NODE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 44.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -36.0% for NODE. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NODE charges 0.67%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $67 annually, a gap of $64 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.86% for NODE.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and NODE share 8 holdings out of 545 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NODE?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NODE charges 0.67%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $64 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or NODE?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.79% vs +11.84% for NODE, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +7.06% vs +33.15% for NODE. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or NODE?
NODE has been the more volatile fund at 44.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs NODE -36.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and NODE?
IVV and NODE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NODE?
IVV and NODE share 8 common holdings with a 1.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 545 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NODE?
IVV yields 1.10% while NODE yields 0.86%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.