NODE vs VYM
VanEck Onchain Economy ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, NODE or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. NODE led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NODE | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.67% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $58M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.86% | 2.24% |
| Holdings | 49 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +11.29% | +14.82%Best |
| 1Y Return | +23.04%Best | +20.84% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.64% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.28% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 43.2% | 8.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -36.0% | -6.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $15,379Best | $13,259 |
| Top 10 Weight | 54.5% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 13, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 14, 2025 to Sep 4, 2026 (1.3 years).
NODE vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
NODE vs VYM Performance
VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE) is an ETF from VanEck and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NODE returned +23.04% while VYM returned +20.84%. Year to date, NODE is up 11.29% versus a gain of 14.82% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NODE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 43.2% compared with 8.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.0% for NODE and -6.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.38. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NODE charges 0.67% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $67 vs $4 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NODE currently yields 0.86% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
1.4% of NODE's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.1% of VYM's money is in holdings NODE also owns.
NODE and VYM share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 48 positions we hold weights for in NODE and 603 in VYM, against full books of 49 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 569 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for NODE (97.3% of the fund), and 31 for NODE that do not appear in VYM (71.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NODE | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NRGNrg Energy | 1.42% | 0.12% | 1.30% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NODE and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NODE or VYM?
NODE has an expense ratio of 0.67% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $63 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NODE or VYM?
Over the past year NODE returned +23.04% vs +20.84% for VYM, so NODE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), NODE annualized +39.25% vs +24.23% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NODE or VYM?
NODE has been the more volatile fund at 43.2% annualized versus 8.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: NODE -36.0% vs VYM -6.7%.
Should I hold both NODE and VYM?
NODE and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.38, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between NODE and VYM?
1.4% of NODE's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.1% of VYM's is in holdings NODE also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 48 positions we hold weights for in NODE and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, NODE or VYM?
NODE yields 0.86% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than NODE?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. NODE led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.