IVV vs NRAM
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Yorkville America Next Generation Memory Index ETF
Which is better, IVV or NRAM?
IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NRAM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.60% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $2M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 10 |
| YTD Return | +13.14%Best | -17.00% |
| 1Y Return | +15.50% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.69% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.78% | - |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Yorkville America Equities, LLC |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 10, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
IVV vs NRAM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs NRAM Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Yorkville America Next Generation Memory Index ETF (NRAM) is an ETF from Yorkville America Equities, LLC. Year to date, IVV is up 13.14% versus a loss of 17.00% for NRAM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NRAM charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $60 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.00% for NRAM.
Holdings Overlap
At least 2.8% of IVV's money is in holdings NRAM also owns.
Stated as a floor: for NRAM, our book for it covers 80.2% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
IVV and NRAM share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 10 in NRAM, against full books of 508 and 10.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and NRAM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NRAM?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NRAM charges 0.60%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NRAM?
At least 2.8% of IVV's money is in holdings NRAM also owns. Our book for NRAM is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 10 in NRAM.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NRAM?
IVV yields 1.10% while NRAM yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NRAM better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.