IVV vs NSI
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. NSI delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NSI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.75% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $42M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.23% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 105 | |
| YTD Return | +13.22% | +10.39% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.62% | +27.59% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.17% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.42% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 13.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -16.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | National Security Index | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 6, 2023 |
IVV vs NSI Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and National Security Emerging Markets Index ETF (NSI) is a ETF from National Security Index. Over the past year IVV returned +21.62% while NSI returned +27.59%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.22% versus a gain of 10.39% for NSI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.0% for NSI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -16.6% for NSI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NSI charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 1.23% for NSI.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and NSI share 0 holdings out of 604 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NSI?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NSI charges 0.75%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or NSI?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.62% vs +27.59% for NSI, so NSI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +7.02% vs +20.22% for NSI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or NSI?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.0% for NSI. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs NSI -16.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and NSI?
IVV and NSI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NSI?
IVV and NSI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 604 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NSI?
IVV yields 1.10% while NSI yields 1.23%, so NSI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.