IVV vs NVDX

IVV vs NVDX

Which is better, IVV or NVDX?

Large Cap Blend against Multi Alternative.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, NVDX over 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVNVDX
Expense Ratio0.03%Best1.05%
AUM$876.4B$414M
Dividend Yield1.06%0.00%
Holdings50813
YTD Return+12.39%Best+12.21%
1Y Return+16.61%Best+14.29%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.38%+112.62%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+13.51%-
Volatility (annualized)12.4%Best79.6%
Max Drawdown-18.8%Best-68.2%
$10,000 over 2.9 years$18,495$89,136Best
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)REX Shares
CategoryEquityAlternative
StyleLarge Cap BlendMulti Alternative
InceptionMay 15, 2000Oct 18, 2023

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 19, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.9 years).

IVV vs NVDX growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

IVV vs NVDX Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and T-Rex 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX) is an ETF from REX Shares. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while NVDX returned +14.29%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 12.21% for NVDX.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.38% per year against +112.62% for NVDX.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

NVDX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 79.6% compared with 12.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -68.2% for NVDX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while NVDX charges 1.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $105 annually, a gap of $102 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for NVDX.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of IVV and NVDX you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

IVVNVDX

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or NVDX?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NVDX charges 1.05%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $102 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, IVV or NVDX?

Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs +14.29% for NVDX, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, IVV or NVDX?

NVDX has been the more volatile fund at 79.6% annualized versus 12.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs NVDX -68.2%.

Should I hold both IVV and NVDX?

IVV and NVDX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NVDX?

IVV yields 1.06% while NVDX yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is NVDX better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, NVDX over 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.