NVDX vs VYM

NVDX vs VYM

Which is better, NVDX or VYM?

Multi Alternative against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. NVDX led over 3Y and the full window, VYM over 1Y.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNVDXVYM
Expense Ratio1.05%0.04%Best
AUM$414M$81.6B
Dividend Yield0.00%2.22%
Holdings13613
YTD Return+18.94%Best+10.96%
1Y Return+12.04%+15.42%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+116.29%Best+17.78%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.05%
Volatility (annualized)79.4%10.8%Best
Max Drawdown-68.2%-14.5%Best
$10,000 over 2.9 years$93,671Best$16,678
Fund FamilyREX SharesVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleMulti AlternativeLarge Cap Value
InceptionOct 18, 2023Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 19, 2023 to Sep 22, 2026 (2.9 years).

NVDX vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

NVDX vs VYM Performance

T-Rex 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX) is an ETF from REX Shares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NVDX returned +12.04% while VYM returned +15.42%. Year to date, NVDX is up 18.94% versus a gain of 10.96% for VYM.

Over three years, NVDX compounded at +116.29% per year against +17.78% for VYM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

NVDX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 79.4% compared with 10.8% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -68.2% for NVDX and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.29. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

NVDX charges 1.05% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $105 vs $4 annually, a gap of $101 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NVDX currently yields 0.00% against 2.22% for VYM.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of NVDX and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

NVDXVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, NVDX or VYM?

NVDX has an expense ratio of 1.05% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $101 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, NVDX or VYM?

Over the past year NVDX returned +12.04% vs +15.42% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, NVDX or VYM?

NVDX has been the more volatile fund at 79.4% annualized versus 10.8% for VYM. Worst drawdown: NVDX -68.2% vs VYM -14.5%.

Should I hold both NVDX and VYM?

NVDX and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.29, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, NVDX or VYM?

NVDX yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than NVDX?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. NVDX led over 3Y and the full window, VYM over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.