IVV vs NVII
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF
Which is better, IVV or NVII?
Large Cap Blend against Option Writing.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, NVII over the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NVII |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.49% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $112M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 55.22% |
| Holdings | 508 | 6 |
| YTD Return | +12.39%Best | -3.06% |
| 1Y Return | +16.61%Best | +4.32% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.38% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.51% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.0%Best | 29.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.9%Best | -26.9% |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $13,164 | $14,759Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | REX Shares |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Option Writing |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 28, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 28, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.3 years).
IVV vs NVII growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
IVV vs NVII Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF (NVII) is an ETF from REX Shares. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while NVII returned +4.32%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a loss of 3.06% for NVII.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NVII has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.9% compared with 12.0% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for IVV and -26.9% for NVII. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NVII charges 1.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $149 annually, a gap of $146 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 55.22% for NVII.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and NVII you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NVII?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NVII charges 1.49%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $146 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or NVII?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs +4.32% for NVII, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +23.55% vs +34.91% for NVII. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or NVII?
NVII has been the more volatile fund at 29.9% annualized versus 12.0% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -8.9% vs NVII -26.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and NVII?
IVV and NVII have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NVII?
IVV yields 1.06% while NVII yields 55.22%, so NVII currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NVII better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, NVII over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.