IVV vs OAIM
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs OneAscent International Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | OAIM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.89% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $359M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.86% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 61 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | +13.19% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | +22.03% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | +17.77% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 13.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -14.7% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | OneAscent Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 14, 2022 |
IVV vs OAIM Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and OneAscent International Equity ETF (OAIM) is a ETF from OneAscent Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while OAIM returned +22.03%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a gain of 13.19% for OAIM.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.47% per year against +17.77% for OAIM. Across the full 4-year window we track, OAIM has the edge at +19.85% annualized vs +7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.7% for OAIM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -14.7% for OAIM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while OAIM charges 0.89%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $89 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.86% for OAIM.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and OAIM share 0 holdings out of 552 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or OAIM?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while OAIM charges 0.89%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $86 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or OAIM?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs +22.03% for OAIM, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +19.85% for OAIM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or OAIM?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.7% for OAIM. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs OAIM -14.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and OAIM?
IVV and OAIM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and OAIM?
IVV and OAIM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 552 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or OAIM?
IVV yields 1.09% while OAIM yields 0.86%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.