IVV vs OCTT
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs AllianzIM US Equity Buffer10 Oct ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | OCTT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.74% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $56M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 5 | |
| YTD Return | +13.72% | +9.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.64% | +15.47% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.55% | +13.61% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.27% | +10.67% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 9.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -13.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | AllianzIM | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 30, 2020 |
IVV vs OCTT Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and AllianzIM US Equity Buffer10 Oct ETF (OCTT) is a ETF from AllianzIM. Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% while OCTT returned +15.47%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.72% versus a gain of 9.72% for OCTT.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.55% per year against +13.61% for OCTT; over five years the annualized figures are +13.27% and +10.67% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, OCTT has the edge at +11.68% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 9.4% for OCTT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -13.5% for OCTT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while OCTT charges 0.74%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $74 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for OCTT.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or OCTT?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while OCTT charges 0.74%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $71 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or OCTT?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% vs +15.47% for OCTT, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +11.68% for OCTT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or OCTT?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 9.4% for OCTT. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs OCTT -13.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and OCTT?
IVV and OCTT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or OCTT?
IVV yields 1.09% while OCTT yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.