IVV vs OILK
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. OILK delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | OILK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.69% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $229M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 8.58% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 5 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +50.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +39.33% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | +11.15% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | +16.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 82.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -75.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | ProShares | |
| Category | Equity | Commodity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 26, 2016 |
IVV vs OILK Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETF (OILK) is a ETF from ProShares. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while OILK returned +39.33%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 50.27% for OILK.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.08% per year against +11.15% for OILK; over five years the annualized figures are +12.96% and +16.34% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, OILK has the edge at +20.38% annualized vs +7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
OILK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 82.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -75.0% for OILK. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.39. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while OILK charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $69 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 8.58% for OILK.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and OILK share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or OILK?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while OILK charges 0.69%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $66 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or OILK?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +39.33% for OILK, so OILK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +20.38% for OILK. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or OILK?
OILK has been the more volatile fund at 82.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs OILK -75.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and OILK?
IVV and OILK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.39, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and OILK?
IVV and OILK share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or OILK?
IVV yields 1.10% while OILK yields 8.58%, so OILK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.