IVV vs OOQB
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs One+One Nasdaq-100 and Bitcoin ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | OOQB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.85% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $696,442.48 | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 13.88% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 4 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | -20.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | +9.78% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 43.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -53.4% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Volatility Shares, LLC | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 19, 2025 |
IVV vs OOQB Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and One+One Nasdaq-100 and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) is a ETF from Volatility Shares, LLC. Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while OOQB returned +9.78%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a loss of 20.22% for OOQB.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
OOQB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 43.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -53.4% for OOQB. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while OOQB charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $85 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 13.88% for OOQB.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or OOQB?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while OOQB charges 0.85%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or OOQB?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs +9.78% for OOQB, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs -26.16% for OOQB. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or OOQB?
OOQB has been the more volatile fund at 43.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs OOQB -53.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and OOQB?
IVV and OOQB have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or OOQB?
IVV yields 1.09% while OOQB yields 13.88%, so OOQB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.